|
|
Hmm ...
I really prefer the image to be as high a quality as possible, although I
do tend to get annoyed if someone posts something that is larger
that 640x480 pixels, since that makes it difficult to view on my
screen.
I am sure that I am not the only one who is examing the posted
images -- especially the good ones -- pixel by pixel in order to see
how a particular effect works.
I tend to think that around 200k is the upper limit and generally
compress between 100-200k. Am I doing the wrong thing?
Aaron
"Stefan Persson" <azy### [at] teliacom> wrote in message
news:3f476202$1@news.povray.org...
> This is just a humble request:
> When you post images, please pay attention and compress the images.
> IMHO it doesn't matter if there is some artifacts. If the image suffers
> greatly from this, post a small image here with a link to a larger one.
> This way I can judge for myself wether I want to download it or not.
> I really enjoy viewing all images in this NG, both the professional and
> the.. ehr.. not so professional, but it's really annoying to see images
> posted
> here wich could easily be compressed down to 50% or more.
>
> Please yell at me if I'm totally out of line here.
>
> /Stefan
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|